Can the warrant reimbursement fee be collected only when a peace officer executes or processes the warrant, capias, or capias pro fine?

The statement is true because the warrant reimbursement fee is specifically designed to cover the costs incurred when a peace officer is involved in executing or processing a warrant, capias, or capias pro fine. This fee is not applicable in other circumstances, meaning it is collected only when there is direct involvement from a peace officer as defined.

The rationale behind this is rooted in the incurred administrative costs and resources used during these specific law enforcement activities. By linking the fee directly to the execution or processing of the warrant, municipalities can ensure that the fees collected align with the actual services rendered, thus maintaining fiscal responsibility in managing law enforcement budgets.

Other choices such as only applying to non-arrest warrants or only in felony cases do not capture the comprehensive nature of the peace officer's role in all warrant situations where processing is involved, and hence may misrepresent the broader applicability of the reimbursement fee.