Is it proper for a court to follow recommendations of a city auditor regarding procedures for court costs and fines?

Following the recommendations of a city auditor regarding procedures for court costs and fines can be considered appropriate because auditors are tasked with ensuring transparency, accountability, and operational efficiency in government practices. Their recommendations are typically based on thorough analysis and assessment of existing procedures, financial practices, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

By adhering to these recommendations, a court can enhance its processes related to the collection of fines and costs, thereby improving financial management and promoting fairness and consistency in legal outcomes. The auditor's insights can help identify inefficiencies, misconduct, or areas susceptible to improvement, which is crucial in maintaining public trust and upholding the integrity of the judicial system.

The other options reflect varying degrees of uncertainty or limitation regarding the implementation of an auditor's recommendations. However, following these recommendations generally leads to better governance and procedural integrity, making it a sound practice for courts.