True or False: Courts must report DPS forfeitures of bail for defendants charged with traffic violations even if not convicted?

The assertion that courts must report DPS forfeitures of bail for defendants charged with traffic violations even if not convicted is indeed true. This requirement emphasizes the accountability and tracking of bail forfeitures as part of the legal process, ensuring that there is transparency in the handling of these cases.

Even in instances where a defendant is not ultimately convicted, the forfeiture of bail signifies that the defendant failed to appear in court as mandated. Reporting these forfeitures contributes to the state's data on traffic violations and enforcement actions, helping maintain an effective legal system.

This approach is consistent across various jurisdictions, where the focus is not solely on the outcome of the trial or hearing but also on the procedural aspects and obligations of the defendants during legal proceedings. Hence, this reporting is crucial for maintaining order within the jurisdiction and for informing future legal practices and policies concerning traffic violations.

The other options do not accurately reflect the comprehensive requirement of reporting bail forfeitures for all traffic violations, irrespective of the conviction status or the nature of the offense.