True or False: If an off-duty peace officer appears at trial but does not testify, the court may assess a reimbursement fee.

The statement is true because there are provisions within the law that allow courts to assess a reimbursement fee for costs incurred when an off-duty peace officer appears in court, even if they do not end up testifying. This practice is meant to ensure that law enforcement resources are compensated for their time and any expenses related to their attendance at trial.

The reimbursement fee can cover costs such as overtime pay, travel expenses, or other related expenses that the department might have incurred to have the officer present. This serves to incentivize proper attendance while also providing a framework for the financial responsibilities associated with maintaining law enforcement engagement in judicial processes.

The nuances of the law may vary based on jurisdiction, but generally, the principle remains that if an off-duty peace officer is summoned to court, the system recognizes the associated costs, allowing the court to impose a reimbursement fee regardless of whether the officer ultimately provides testimony.