True or False: Statutes limit the maximum possible penalties that municipalities can impose in their ordinances.

The statement that statutes limit the maximum possible penalties that municipalities can impose in their ordinances is false. In fact, while municipal ordinances must still comply with broader state laws and constitutional protections, municipalities possess a certain degree of authority to establish their own penalty structures within the framework provided by the state.

Often, state statutes do set maximum penalties for specific violations or types of offenses, but municipalities have the discretion to determine the specific penalties for their local ordinances, as long as they do not exceed any overarching limits imposed by state law. This allows municipalities to tailor their penalties to effectively address local issues while remaining compliant with state regulations.

The other options hint at limitations that are not universally applicable. For instance, the idea that limitations might only apply to misdemeanors or in specific cases implies a broader constraint that does not hold true in the general context of municipal ordinance enforcement. Overall, municipalities are empowered to create and enforce regulations suited to their communities without strict penal limitations imposed by statutes.