When a court prorates costs and fees, which must be paid first?

In scenarios involving the proration of costs and fees, fees owed to the state generally take precedence over those owed to the city. This prioritization is based on the legal framework that often dictates that obligations to the state must be satisfied first, reflecting the higher authority of state law in relation to municipal regulations. As such, when a court determines how costs are to be allocated, it recognizes the state's interest in recovering fees and costs, which can include fines and other legal charges that are mandated by law.

Additionally, municipal obligations may be significant, but they typically follow the state's obligation, reinforcing the principle that state interests are paramount in such financial distributions. This understanding helps establish a systematic approach to managing the financial responsibilities associated with legal proceedings.