Which of the following is NOT a potential method for paying court costs when granted deferred disposition?

When considering methods for paying court costs under deferred disposition, it's important to understand that these payment options are typically designed to provide flexibility and assist defendants in fulfilling their obligations without immediate financial burden.

Payment in installments allows defendants to spread their costs over a specified period, making it more manageable for those who may face economic difficulties. This method is particularly beneficial for individuals who cannot afford to pay a lump sum at once.

Community service is another alternative that may be offered, where defendants can fulfill their court obligations through service to the community, essentially providing a way to offset costs through labor rather than financial payment.

Paying upfront refers to the option of settling all court costs at the time they are imposed. This is a straightforward approach that eliminates any future financial obligation resulting from the court's ruling.

In contrast, waiving all costs is not typically a method available for defendants. Courts generally require some form of payment or restitution as part of a deferred disposition, thereby ensuring that justice is upheld and responsibilities are met. Completely waiving costs would undermine the court's authority and the purpose of imposing costs, making it an unlikely option. Thus, the assertion that waiving all costs is a potential method for paying court costs is incorrect.