Which two types of municipal courts may a city choose to establish?

A city can choose to establish record and non-record municipal courts based on the need to manage specific types of cases and the jurisdiction required for those cases. Record courts are typically authorized to keep a formal record of proceedings and decisions, which is essential for certain legal processes, while non-record courts may handle lesser matters without the same requirements.

When managing municipal affairs, having this distinction allows cities to tailor their court systems to fit the volume and complexity of cases they handle. Record courts often deal with serious infractions or issues that might require an appeal, while non-record courts could be used for minor disputes that do not necessitate a formal record.

This setup enhances the efficiency of the judicial system within the municipality by ensuring that resources are allocated appropriately based on the type of cases being processed. Factors such as cost, accessibility, and community needs can all influence a city's decision to establish either type of court.

In contrast, the other options represent courtroom structures or specializations that may not be relevant or applicable specifically to municipal courts. For instance, criminal and civil courts typically refer to broader categories that exist in various levels of the judiciary, while traffic and small claims courts focus on specific types of issues. District and county refer more to geographical and jurisdictional design